Neil Tesser, Chicago Jazz Music Examiner
“There are good reasons the violin plays so large a role in so many of the world’s musical traditions, starting with the vocality of its timbre and the humanness of its inflection, and ranging from its transcendent held notes to the prick of its pizzicato. Many jazz violinists have mastered some of these capabilities, but only a handful have shown a command of them all – let alone the ability to swing convincingly on the instrument. Brock has all that, and more: his solos have direction and spirit, and they open a window to an ordered but creative musical intelligence.
A few other violinists can match Brock’s technique, and in recent years, some of them have attained significant accolades for their improvising – including a couple who can’t solo their way out of a paper bag. Accept no substitutions: Zach Brock is the pre-eminent improvising violinist of his generation.”
Howard Reich, Chicago Tribune
“The inarguable melodic grace of the opening and the tonal majesty of the finale exquisitely framed the jazz-based centerpiece, with guest violinist Zach Brock offering the connective tissue between the two. In effect, Brock merged jazz rhythm with classical gestures, making his pivotal portion of “Amadeus Had a Dream” into something of a jazz violin concerto.”
Michael Jackson, Chicago Sun-Times
“During “Amadeus Had A Dream,” stage lights were dimmed leaving the orchestra members in silhouette and the audience slack-jawed at the marvel of Brock’s Paganini-level mastery.”
Stanley Clarke, The Blue Note, NYC
“I called the great French violinist Jean-Luc Ponty and I said ‘So, who’s the new cat? Who’s got the stuff? And he said Zach Brock.”
Patricia Barber, MacArthur Grant Recipient and Blue Note recording artist
“Zach proves himself as composer, improviser and producer. With a fiercely charismatic presence onstage, Zach is the one on whom to place your bets in jazz. ”
Don Heckman, Los Angeles Times
“Add Brock to the small list of players finding ways to bridge the potentially hazardous chasm between the violin and jazz. Recently awarded a Carnegie Hall residency, Brock is an intriguing young artist with a bright future.”
Dave Liebman, NEA Jazz Master/Saxophonist
“This is very exciting music that highlights a very special timbre with Zach Brock’s exciting violin playing front and center. The group definitely projects a lot of energy and power that demands the listener’s attention.”
Tad Hendrickson, College Music Journal
“…it all eventually comes back to Brock’s violin – pulling lilting emotions, making the strings pop, and generally giving it his all, the young violinist won’t strictly be a Chicago treasure for long.”
Budd Kopman, All About Jazz
“‘Live At The Jazz Factory’ will make a believer of those holding even the slightest prejudice against the violin that Brock is, indeed, a musician first and a violinist second, and that the Coffee Achievers can take down the house. ”
Mary Ellen Hutton , Music in Cincinnati
“Violinist Zach Brock is a musician of prodigious ability and keen artistic insight…You might call him the Joshua Bell of the jazz violin. ”
Jeffrey Lee Puckett, The Louisville Courier-Journal
“Violinist Zach Brock is starting to turn heads in the world of jazz, building a reputation as a consummate technician willing to take chances without abandoning musicality…classic American jazz with one eye on the fringes.”
Dick Crockett, “Still Another Jazz Show,” 88.7FM
“Brock’s electric violin work is soaring-intense-remarkable…Jean-Luc Ponty meets Chuck Palahniuk in “Fight Club.” Chemistry is good enough for the long haul, one of many inclusions in a brightening career. ”
bruceandgerri, Create Tucker (Nov 23, 2010)
“Several weeks ago at the Purple Fiddle we heard a fantastic group, Zach Brock and the Magic Number. For the first half of the show we were amazed at the virtuosity, originality, and energy of their jazz. For the second half of the show we watched and listened differently to all of the musicians—Zach on violin, Fred on drums, and Matt on bass. It wasn’t their virtuosity but their musical conversation that engaged us. Not only did they play their instruments as if they were talking to each other, they listened and took ideas from each other. It was obvious that all three of the musicians not only loved their instrument, in a sense they lived it. Player and instrument were one, and each one of them needed the other. And even though we weren’t playing, we were engaged in their conversation; we were living what they were living.”
